Community
osapeers.org
This article is available in
About this article

Hardik Agrawal
AuthorAssigned categories
With the May 28, 2026, deadline coming closer the compliance obligations under EUDAMED apply across the full range of economic operators, not just manufacturers. Importers, distributors, and authorized representatives (ARs) each have their own distinct obligations under the MDR (Medical Devices Regulation) and IVDR (In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation).
The legal obligation for importers to carry out conformity checks before placing a device on the EU market already exists. What changes from May 28, 2026, is that the relevant EUDAMED modules become mandatory to use, which means the device registration check must be carried out directly in the system.
Under Article 13, importers are required to verify that the device is registered in the database and to ensure their own importer details are recorded where required. Importers do not create the manufacturer’s registration record, but they cannot place a device on the market unless they have confirmed that registration is in place. If it isn’t, handling the product may put an importer in breach of their own obligations, independently of the manufacturer’s compliance status.
Beyond the registration check, importers also need to confirm before placing a device on the market:
Distributors have their own verification duties under Article 14, but their role is narrower. They are required to check that registration is in place before making a device available, though they are not placing devices on the market themselves and do not carry the same scope of responsibility as importers. In particular, they are not registered in the Actor module of EUDAMED and have no SRN; their access to EUDAMED is limited to the public website.
For non-EU manufacturers, the AR is the regulatory interface with the EU market. The manufacturer remains the primary actor for device registration in EUDAMED, but the AR is responsible for cooperating on compliance matters and supporting the process, which from May 28 includes making sure the mandatory module submissions are handled accurately.
The practical risk right now is capacity. An AR without a clear process for supporting EUDAMED submissions can slow down or block market access, and with weeks to the deadline, switching ARs is rarely realistic. The more immediate step is to clarify with your current AR exactly what they can handle and where the manufacturer needs to take direct action.
For ARs themselves: the primary registration duty sits with the manufacturer, but if you are facilitating or validating submissions on their behalf, ensuring the data is accurate and complete is part of your role, and gaps in that process can create exposure for both parties.
Non-compliance carries penalties for all economic operators, not just manufacturers. Under MDR and IVDR, member states are required to set penalties that are effective, proportionate, and dissuasive. The specific amounts vary by country, but enforcement can extend beyond fines to corrective action orders, suspension of market placement activities, and increased regulatory scrutiny going forward. Importers can face these measures independently of anything applied to the manufacturer.
Ongoing obligations once you’re registered
Getting registered is just the beginning. Here’s what the ongoing requirement looks like in practice:
Knowing the consequences of non-compliance is one thing. Having a structured plan to address them is another.
The osapiens EUDAMED Compliance Guide is designed to help you bridge that gap. It covers:
Download the guide and build a compliance plan that’s grounded in what the regulation actually requires.